Browse the Knowledge Hub74 resources
Test cases
Date picker test cases, where the defect is usually one day off
Twenty six cases covering timezone shifts, ambiguous day and month order, impossible typed dates, minimum and maximum limits, leap years, daylight saving, ranges, disabled dates, keyboard operation and screen reader announcements.
All 26 test cases, ready to copy
Free to use and adapt, no sign-up. Download as CSV or Markdown, or copy it straight into your own tooling.
Last updated
26 worked examples
Select a date from the calendar
TypeFunctionalPriorityHigh- Test data
- Any valid selectable date
- Expected result
- Field displays the date in the expected format, the calendar closes, and the value saved matches the date shown to the user exactly.
Open the picker and confirm the default state
TypeFunctionalPriorityMedium- Test data
- Empty field, then a field with an existing value
- Expected result
- Empty opens on the current month with today marked but not selected. A populated field opens on the month of the existing value with it highlighted.
Store the selected date across a timezone boundary
TypeBoundaryPriorityHigh- Test data
- Select the first of a month with the device set to UTC minus 8, then to UTC plus 13
- Expected result
- The stored date is the date chosen, not shifted by a day. Calendar dates must not be converted through a timestamp with a local midnight assumption.
Verify the date displayed after saving and reloading
TypeStatePriorityHigh- Test data
- Save a date, reload, and view it in another timezone
- Expected result
- Identical date in both places. A calendar date is a date, not an instant, and should be stored as such.
Type a date directly into the field
TypeFunctionalPriorityHigh- Test data
- The documented format, typed by hand
- Expected result
- Accepted and parsed, the calendar reflects it, and no reformatting loses the value.
Type an ambiguous date
TypeBoundaryPriorityHigh- Test data
- 03/04/2026 with the locale set to United Kingdom, then to United States
- Expected result
- Parsed according to the stated locale, and the expected format is visible next to the field. Ambiguous parsing that differs from the placeholder is a real financial risk on contracts and bookings.
Type an impossible date
TypeNegativePriorityHigh- Test data
- 31/02/2026, 00/01/2026, 32/13/2026
- Expected result
- Rejected with a clear message. Silent rolling forward to 3 March is worse than an error, because the user never notices.
Type a partial or malformed value
TypeNegativePriorityMedium- Test data
- 12/, 2026, 1-1-26, text, an empty string after clearing
- Expected result
- Refused or completed deliberately, never left in a half parsed state that submits as something unexpected.
Enter a two digit year
TypeBoundaryPriorityMedium- Test data
- 01/01/26, then 01/01/99
- Expected result
- Interpreted by a documented pivot rule and echoed back in full, so the user can see whether 1926 or 2026 was understood.
Respect the minimum selectable date
TypeBoundaryPriorityHigh- Test data
- The minimum date, one day before it, and the same values typed rather than clicked
- Expected result
- Minimum accepted, earlier refused, and the rule enforced on the typed path and on the server, not only by greying out cells.
Respect the maximum selectable date
TypeBoundaryPriorityHigh- Test data
- The maximum date, one day after it
- Expected result
- Maximum accepted, later refused with the limit stated.
Handle a minimum of today as midnight passes
TypeStatePriorityHigh- Test data
- Open the picker just before midnight, select tomorrow, submit just after midnight
- Expected result
- Either still valid or refused with a clear message. The boundary must be evaluated server side at submission, not fixed when the page loaded.
Select 29 February in a leap year and a non leap year
TypeBoundaryPriorityMedium- Test data
- 29/02/2028, then 29/02/2027
- Expected result
- Available in the leap year, absent and rejected if typed in the non leap year.
Select a date across a daylight saving transition
TypeBoundaryPriorityHigh- Test data
- The day clocks change in the user region, plus the day either side
- Expected result
- The date stored and displayed is unchanged. Durations calculated from it account for the 23 or 25 hour day.
Verify disabled dates cannot be chosen by any route
TypeSecurityPriorityHigh- Test data
- A blocked date such as a weekend or a fully booked day, submitted directly to the endpoint
- Expected result
- Refused by the server. Disabled cells in the interface are a convenience, never the rule.
Select a range and confirm ordering
TypeFunctionalPriorityHigh- Test data
- Start after end, then the same date for both
- Expected result
- Either the values swap with a visible indication or the second selection is refused. A same day range is valid or refused deliberately, and the rule is stated.
Enforce a maximum range span
TypeBoundaryPriorityMedium- Test data
- A span at the limit, then one day beyond
- Expected result
- Limit accepted, beyond refused with the maximum stated in the message.
Clear a populated date
TypeFunctionalPriorityMedium- Test data
- Use the clear control, then delete the text manually
- Expected result
- Both routes empty the value and the stored record, and a required field then reports itself as missing rather than keeping the old value.
Navigate months and years
TypeFunctionalPriorityMedium- Test data
- Move across a year boundary in both directions, then jump by year
- Expected result
- December to January advances the year, and any month or year jump control lands on the intended month.
Verify the locale calendar layout
TypeCompatibilityPriorityMedium- Test data
- Locales where the week starts on Sunday, Monday and Saturday
- Expected result
- First day of week, month names and day abbreviations follow the locale, and a right to left locale mirrors the layout.
Operate the picker by keyboard only
TypeAccessibilityPriorityHigh- Test data
- Tab to the field, arrow keys, Page Up and Page Down, Home, End, Enter and Escape
- Expected result
- Arrows move by day, Page keys move by month, Enter selects, Escape closes without changing the value, and focus returns to the field.
Verify screen reader behaviour
TypeAccessibilityPriorityHigh- Test data
- NVDA or VoiceOver on the field and inside the calendar
- Expected result
- The field announces its expected format, the focused cell announces the full date, disabled dates announce as unavailable, and the selected date is confirmed after choosing.
Verify behaviour on mobile
TypeCompatibilityPriorityHigh- Test data
- iOS Safari and Android Chrome, native control and custom control
- Expected result
- The touch target is large enough, the control is not obscured by the on screen keyboard, and a native picker returns the same value format as the custom one.
Paste a date into the field
TypeBoundaryPriorityMedium- Test data
- Paste from a spreadsheet, including a value with a trailing space and one with a time appended
- Expected result
- Trimmed and parsed if valid, refused clearly if not, and never silently truncated.
Submit the form without touching the picker
TypeNegativePriorityHigh- Test data
- A required date field left untouched, with a placeholder or a prefilled default
- Expected result
- A required empty field blocks submission. A prefilled default is only submitted if defaulting is intended, because an unnoticed default date is a common source of wrong bookings.
Verify the value that reaches storage and reports
TypeStatePriorityHigh- Test data
- Inspect the API payload, the database value and an exported report for the same selection
- Expected result
- All three agree with what the user saw. This is the single check that catches timezone and format defects before customers do.
What goes in each field
ID
RequiredStable identifier, prefixed by module.
Test case
RequiredWhat is being verified, in one line.
Type
Functional, negative, boundary, security, state, performance, accessibility or compatibility. Use it to check coverage is spread rather than clustered on the happy path.
Priority
Risk based. Anything that can store a different date from the one the user selected is High, because a date that is wrong by one day breaks bookings, billing periods and reporting silently.
Test data
The specific values, including the invalid and boundary ones.
Expected result
RequiredThe precise observable outcome, including message text where the wording itself is the requirement.
Change the device timezone and repeat
Clicking a calendar cell always works. These four conditions are where the stored value stops matching the selection.
Test in two timezones
Select the first of a month at UTC minus 8 and at UTC plus 13. A date stored through a local midnight assumption shifts by a day.
Type, do not click
Typed input is where 03/04 becomes March or April depending on locale, and where 31 February silently becomes 3 March.
Send a disabled date
Greyed out cells are presentation. Post the blocked date straight to the endpoint and confirm it is refused.
Follow the value to storage
Compare the interface, the API payload, the database row and an exported report. All four must agree.
Why date fields fail in production
The off by one day defect is the reason this control deserves its own test set. It happens when a calendar date is stored as an instant: the picker produces local midnight, that is converted to UTC, and a user west of Greenwich sees the previous day while a user in New Zealand sees the next. A date of birth, a contract start or a billing period is a date, not a moment in time, and should be stored as one. Testing in a single timezone will never reveal it.
Ambiguous parsing is the second. Any field that accepts typing has to decide whether 03/04/2026 is March or April, and the answer must match both the placeholder and the locale. This is not a cosmetic issue on a booking or a contract, and the fix is to state the expected format next to the field and to echo the parsed date back in an unambiguous form.
Silent correction is the third and the most deceptive. A field that accepts 31 February and stores 3 March has produced a wrong record that nobody will question, because no error was shown. Rejecting impossible dates is better behaviour than helpfully rolling them forward.
Finally, validation applied only to calendar cells. Minimums, maximums and blocked dates are frequently enforced by disabling cells, then bypassed entirely by typing or by a direct request. Every date rule needs a server side check, and the midnight case deserves its own test: a form opened at 23:58 and submitted at 00:01 was validated against yesterday.
Suggest an improvementDates driving money or bookings?
QAble tests date handling end to end, including timezone behaviour, locale parsing and what actually lands in storage and in reports.
Functional testing servicesMore test case sets
View allTest cases for a login page
Test cases25 cases across functional, negative, boundary, security, session and accessibility paths, including account enumeration and lockout.Test cases for a registration form
Test cases28 cases covering validation, duplicate accounts, email verification, password rules and the enumeration leak most signup forms ship with.Test cases for search functionality
Test cases28 cases across relevance, partial and fuzzy matching, filters, pagination, empty states, injection attempts and performance under load.Test cases for a shopping cart
Test cases27 cases on quantity limits, price recalculation, stock changes, coupon stacking, guest to account merge and cart persistence.Test cases for checkout and payment
Test cases30 cases including 3D Secure, declines, timeouts, duplicate charges, idempotency, refunds and partial captures.Test cases for file upload
Test cases28 cases on size and type limits, spoofed content types, malicious filenames, progress, resume, virus scanning and storage limits.Test cases for forgot password
Test cases26 cases on reset token expiry, single use enforcement, session invalidation and the enumeration and rate limit gaps that are routine here.Test cases for OTP verification
Test cases26 cases on expiry, resend throttling, attempt limits, code reuse, delivery failure and the brute force window teams forget to close.Test cases for user roles and permissions
Test cases26 cases on horizontal and vertical privilege checks, direct object access, role changes mid-session and permission inheritance.Test cases for form validation
Test cases27 rules-based cases on required fields, length and numeric boundaries, client and server parity, hidden field tampering and error accessibility.Test cases for pagination
Test cases24 cases on ordering stability, records changing mid-session, page size caps, deep offset cost, permission-filtered totals and state restore.Test cases for push notifications
Test cases26 cases on app states, deep link routing, token release on sign out, lock screen privacy, preferences, provider failures and platform differences.Test cases for reports and data export
Test cases25 cases on permission filtering in the file, spreadsheet formula injection, encoding, typed numbers and dates, row limits and audit logging.Test cases for a chatbot
Test cases28 cases on paraphrased intents, context, fallback loops, human handoff, policy grounding, prompt injection and data scoping.Test cases for net banking transactions
Test cases28 cases on duplicate debits from a retried request, concurrent transfers against one balance, daily limits across channels, beneficiary cooling periods, second factor binding and reconciliation.Test cases for wallet and UPI payments
Test cases28 cases on payments that time out with no response, idempotency on retry, racing balances, caps across devices, collect request fraud, mandates and refunds.Test cases for insurance claim submission
Test cases28 cases on coverage at the date of loss, waiting periods, deductibles and sub limits, exclusions and riders, duplicate claims and settlement reconciliation.Test cases for patient records in an EHR
Test cases28 cases on duplicate detection and merge, wrong patient entry, units of measure, allergy and interaction alerting, break glass access and audit of reads.Test cases for CRM lead management
Test cases28 cases on duplicate leads under concurrency, routing and the unrouted fallback, round robin races, territory visibility, conversion and bulk import.Test cases for an ERP purchase order
Test cases28 cases on approval thresholds, amendments that must reset approval, budget commitment races, over receipt tolerance, three-way match and duplicate invoices.Test cases for OTT video playback
Test cases28 cases on bitrate recovery after a dip, DRM renewal mid stream, concurrent stream limits and leaked slots, resume conflicts, ad cue points and offline expiry.Test cases for game level progression
Test cases28 cases on save corruption during a crash write, cloud save conflicts, offline queue replay, unlock gating, currency exploits and purchase restore.Test cases for a REST API
Test cases28 cases on status code correctness, cross tenant resource access, mass assignment, idempotent retries, cursor pagination, rate limits and contract drift.Test cases for SSO and social login
Test cases28 cases on linking an account on an unverified email, state and code replay, redirect allow lists, token signature and issuer, deprovisioning and session rotation.Test cases for subscription and billing
Test cases28 cases on mid cycle proration, duplicate and out of order webhooks, renewal double charges, dunning and grace, trials, coupons, metered usage and tax.Test cases for data tables, filters and sorting
Test cases28 cases on unstable sorts across pages, filters that must reset pagination, selection surviving a filter change, bulk action scope and export fidelity.Test cases for session timeout and concurrent login
Test cases28 cases on tokens that survive sign out, refresh token reuse, idle against absolute lifetime, multi tab expiry, session limits and remote revocation.Test cases for a multi step form wizard
Test cases28 cases on values lost to back navigation, refresh and session expiry, step skipping, server side revalidation, duplicate submission and conditional branches.Test cases for email verification
Test cases28 cases on token reuse and expiry, invalidating earlier links, account enumeration, header injection, safe address change and mail scanner prefetching.Test cases for dashboards and analytics widgets
Test cases28 cases on reconciling against source rows, widgets that disagree, timezone aggregation, zero baselines, no data shown as zero and permission leaks in aggregates.Test cases for booking and reservation
Test cases28 cases on concurrent bookings for the last slot, inventory holds that leak, payment without a booking, cancellation boundaries and channel sync.Test cases for mobile app install and update
Test cases28 cases on migration chains across skipped versions, crashes during post upgrade migration, forced update lockouts, deep links and clean reinstall.Test cases for accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA)
Test cases28 cases on keyboard only completion, focus management, live region announcements, contrast, reflow at 320 pixels, target size and screen reader verification.Test cases for performance and load
Test cases28 cases on spikes with no ramp, recovery after peak, soak and leak detection, pool exhaustion, cold caches, retry storms and data correctness under load.Test cases for the OWASP Top 10
Test cases28 cases on broken access control, mass assignment, injection across every input surface, credential stuffing, session invalidation, SSRF and exposed secrets.Test cases for cross browser compatibility
Test cases28 cases on storage that throws in private mode, blocked third party cookies, engine date parsing, mobile viewport units, in app browsers and ad blockers.Test cases for database and data integrity
Test cases28 cases on uniqueness under concurrency, lost updates, counter races, orphaned rows, migration and backfill safety, replica lag and verified restores.Test cases for localisation and multi language support
Test cases28 cases on text expansion, concatenated sentences, plural rules, locale date parsing, decimal separators, right to left layout, collation and encoding.Test cases for outbound webhooks
Test cases28 cases on retry backoff and dead letter stores, one dead consumer degrading the pipeline, payload signing and replay windows, out of order delivery and endpoint SSRF.Test cases for background jobs and queues
Test cases28 cases on work outliving the visibility timeout, idempotent handlers, poison messages, priority starvation, scheduler overlap across instances and graceful drain.Test cases for real time features and websockets
Test cases28 cases on messages lost in the reconnect gap, half open connections, per channel authorisation, tokens expiring mid connection, backpressure and fanout across instances.Test cases for file storage and media processing
Test cases28 cases on signed URL scope and expiry, serving before scanning completes, content type sniffing, metadata stripping, orphaned objects and derivative failures.Test cases for CSV import and bulk operations
Test cases28 cases on reruns duplicating successes, delimiters inside quoted fields, byte order marks, leading zeros, ambiguous dates and bulk action scope.Test cases for feature flags and progressive rollout
Test cases28 cases on unreachable flag services, unstable bucketing, rollouts that reshuffle users, kill switch latency, server and client mismatch and stale flags.Test cases for Android app lifecycle and permissions
Test cases28 cases on state lost to process death, configuration changes, permanent permission denial, revocation while backgrounded, doze and battery restrictions.Test cases for iOS app lifecycle and permissions
Test cases28 cases on the keychain surviving uninstall, suspended termination, limited photo access, allow once location, app switcher snapshots and biometric invalidation.Test cases for wearable app sync
Test cases28 cases on data recorded away from the phone, duplicate records on resync, full buffers, clock drift, health permissions, battery budgets and unworn readings.Test cases for VR and AR experiences
Test cases28 cases on the frame rate comfort floor, tracking loss, guardian boundaries, involuntary camera movement, AR anchor drift and spatial data privacy.Test cases for IoT device pairing and telemetry
Test cases28 cases on offline buffering and reconnect floods, fleet wide reconnection storms, shared credentials, wrong device clocks and stale queued commands.Test cases for embedded firmware update
Test cases28 cases on power loss mid write, automatic rollback and health confirmation, signature and anti rollback checks, staged rollouts and recovery mode.Test cases for user profile and account settings
Test cases28 cases on partial saves reported as success, optimistic updates the server rejected, mass assignment through a profile form, avatar content inspection and session invalidation.Test cases for account deletion and data export
Test cases28 cases on export links that must be authorised and expiring, deletion cascading to storage, caches, logs and processors, grace periods, legal holds and deadlines.Test cases for consent and cookie management
Test cases28 cases on cookies and tracking requests firing before consent, reject parity with accept, tag manager bypass, withdrawal, cached banners and server side forwarding.Test cases for notification preferences and delivery
Test cases28 cases on opt outs honoured on one channel and ignored on another, marketing sent as transactional, unsubscribe scope, imports resetting consent and digest timezones.Test cases for admin impersonation and support access
Test cases28 cases on actions attributed to the customer instead of the admin, credential exposure, chained and upward impersonation, session expiry and immutable access records.Test cases for audit logs and activity history
Test cases28 cases on forged entries through log injection, immutability and tamper detection, actor attribution across impersonation and jobs, retention and legal holds.Sources
- IANA Time Zone Database the source of truth for offset and daylight saving transitions.
- WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices expected keyboard and screen reader behaviour for widgets.
- WCAG 2.2 the success criteria behind the accessibility cases.
Want date handling proven, not assumed?
QAble covers functional and boundary paths with ISTQB-certified engineers. Start with a free QA audit of your product.